- ADOBE LIGHTROOM CLASSIC REVIEW UPDATE
- ADOBE LIGHTROOM CLASSIC REVIEW PRO
- ADOBE LIGHTROOM CLASSIC REVIEW PROFESSIONAL
ADOBE LIGHTROOM CLASSIC REVIEW PRO
And when we finally get to test this on the rumored 14-inch or 16-inch MacBook Pro with a 2nd generation Apple Silicon processor, we expect these numbers to get even better.
ADOBE LIGHTROOM CLASSIC REVIEW UPDATE
To the best of our knowledge, the closest we ever got was a meager 11 percent jump in 2018, and that benefit was only available if you had a relatively powerful multi-core processor and at least 12GB of RAM.īy comparison, today’s update applies to every Apple Silicon Mac, including the extremely affordable M1 Mac mini that we dubbed the best Mac for most photographers. Sure, Lightroom Classic for Apple Silicon isn’t two or three times faster than its Intel counterpart running on similar hardware, but ask yourself this: when was the last time Adobe released a new version of Lightroom Classic was 25 percent faster in any category? But these results paint a much more impressive story. After the lackluster performance of Lightroom CC for Apple Silicon, we thought we might see a five to 10 percent improvement at the most. We’ll be honest: we did not expect this much of a bump. Here are all of the exports side-by-side, so you can compare them on the same scale: The larger 16-bit TIFF exports saw an improvement of nine to 13 percent compared to Rosetta 2, and a huge 22 to 25 percent improvement compared to the Intel version running on the Intel Mac. Exporting 61-megapixel Sony a7R IV files and 100MP PhaseOne XF files as 100 percent JPEGs was 10 to 12 percent faster than Rosetta 2 emulation, and about 24 percent faster than the Intel Mac. A pretty good start for Adobe:Īnd the good news kept on rolling across every test we ran. In the import test, the ARM-optimized version was about 13.5 percent faster than Rosetta 2 emulation for both Sony and PhaseOne files, and 20 to 24 percent faster than the Intel version running on an Intel chip. The results are presented as the average of at least three consecutive runs to compensate for inconsistencies, although we didn’t see a major change from run to run in any of our tests. Switching over to 1:1 previews allows us to ignore changes in screen resolution/default preview size, and since 1:1 previews take longer to create they give us a better basis for comparison. Note that these tests are a little different than previous benchmarks we’ve run, where we used Standard previews at import. The imports were configured with 1:1 previews, all other boxes unchecked, and exports were performed in two flavors: sRGB JPEGs at 100 percent, and AdobeRGB TIFFs at 16-bit with no compression.
ADOBE LIGHTROOM CLASSIC REVIEW PROFESSIONAL
Most enthusiast and professional photographers prefer Lightroom Classic to its cloud-based sibling Lightroom CC, and Capture One 21 - Lightroom Classic’s biggest rival - showed significant performance gains in almost every category with the release of Version 14.2 optimized for Apple Silicon. Photoshop, on the other hand, experienced a massive performance uplift when it was optimized for Apple Silicon, blowing us away with its GPU, Filter, and especially its Photo Merge scores in Puget Systems’ PugetBench benchmark.įor Adobe, the stakes are particularly high with Lightroom Classic. When Lightroom for M1 was released in December 2020, we found meager performance gains above and beyond what M1 could already do via Rosetta 2 emulation of the Intel version. Our experience with Apple Silicon-optimized apps from Adobe has been 50/50 so far. The latest version of Lightroom Classic was up to 25 percent faster on the M1 than on our more expensive Intel-based Mac. Could Apple’s M1 processor deliver a hefty performance boost for photographers? In short: yes. Our hopes were high for a program so famously sluggish. This morning, Adobe unveiled the long-awaited version of Lightroom Classic that is fully optimized for Apple Silicon devices, and we had a chance to test it out before release.
0 kommentar(er)
